Disgust With Philosophy
From Huben's Wiki
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* [https://philpapers.org/surveys/results.pl The PhilPapers Surveys]: distribution of professional philosophical beliefs. Looks pretty random. | * [https://philpapers.org/surveys/results.pl The PhilPapers Surveys]: distribution of professional philosophical beliefs. Looks pretty random. | ||
* [http://www.stephenhicks.org/2009/06/15/philosophys-longest-sentences/ Philosophy’s longest sentences] | * [http://www.stephenhicks.org/2009/06/15/philosophys-longest-sentences/ Philosophy’s longest sentences] | ||
+ | * [http://existentialcomics.com/comic/250 A Brief History of Metaphysics (comic)] | ||
Philosopher: "What color is the sky?" <br>Student: "Blue." <br>Philosopher: "Let us then proceed from the fact that the sky is blue to reason thusly...." <br>If only the student would observe that the sky is not always blue: it can be gray on a cloudy day, it can be black at night, and sun, moon, stars, clouds, birds, etc. can all make it different than plain, solid blue. If we say the sky is blue, that is not a fact: it is a vague observation or generalization, ignoring the many exceptions, ignoring the scientific explanation of scattering of sunlight and privileging daytime over nighttime conditions. It is not a valid premise that philosophy can be built upon. Most philosophy actually starts with such invalid premises, and it is not too difficult to spot them. | Philosopher: "What color is the sky?" <br>Student: "Blue." <br>Philosopher: "Let us then proceed from the fact that the sky is blue to reason thusly...." <br>If only the student would observe that the sky is not always blue: it can be gray on a cloudy day, it can be black at night, and sun, moon, stars, clouds, birds, etc. can all make it different than plain, solid blue. If we say the sky is blue, that is not a fact: it is a vague observation or generalization, ignoring the many exceptions, ignoring the scientific explanation of scattering of sunlight and privileging daytime over nighttime conditions. It is not a valid premise that philosophy can be built upon. Most philosophy actually starts with such invalid premises, and it is not too difficult to spot them. |